Opinion format

REVIEWER EVALUATION FORM

  1. Do you consider that the manuscript makes a contribution to the field of study covered by this journal?
  2. Does the manuscript demonstrate originality in the ideas presented?
  3. Does the title adequately summarize the main idea of the manuscript? Is it concise and informative?
  4. Is the abstract clear and concise?
  5. Does the abstract reflect the overall structure of the article, including its objective, methodology, results, study limitations, and contribution to the relevant discipline?
  6. Are the keywords appropriate and relevant?
  7. Do you consider the manuscript to be relevant from a theoretical perspective? Please briefly indicate its most significant contribution.
  8. Is the manuscript pertinent, timely, and relevant?
  9. Do you consider that the manuscript makes an empirical contribution?
  10. What are the main limitations of the manuscript (if any)?
  11. Is the specialized literature used appropriately, and are the references relevant and up to date?
  12. Are all references listed in the bibliography cited or mentioned within the text?
  13. Does the manuscript include electronically managed references with active DOI hyperlinks whenever applicable?
  14. Are APA Style guidelines properly followed in citations, references, and source documentation?
  15. Is there internal consistency throughout the manuscript? Specifically:
  1. a) Is the theoretical and methodological approach appropriate?
  2. b) Is there correspondence between the stated objectives and the results achieved?
  3. c) Is the manuscript clearly written and logically organized?
  4. d) Is there consistency between the discussion presented and the conclusions reached?
  1. Please indicate whether the manuscript includes the following sections:
  • Introduction
  • Literature Review or Background
  • Theoretical Framework or Conceptual References
  • Methodology
  • Results, Analysis, and Discussion
  • Conclusions
  1. Based on your evaluation, your recommendation is:
  1. Accept for publication.
  2. Accept for publication with minor revisions at the author's discretion.
  3. Reconsider for publication after major revisions as indicated in the review.
  4. Reject.