Opinion format

1.- Do you consider that the work offers a contribution to the field of study of this journal?

2.- Does the writing show originality in the ideas presented?

3.- Does the title summarize the main idea of ​​the writing, is it concise, informative?

4. Is the abstract clear and concise?

5.- Is the general structure of the article reproduced in the abstract?; that is, where the objective of this, the method used, the results that have been reached, limitations of the study and the contribution of the work to a certain discipline are explained.

6.- Are the keywords relevant?

7.- Do you consider that the text is relevant from a theoretical point of view? Briefly state the most important contribution you make.

8.- Is the document relevant? Timely and convenient.

9.- Do you consider that the text makes an empirical contribution?

10.- What are the major limitations of the text (in case you consider it has them)?

11.- Is the specialized bibliography used appropriately, recognized and updated?

12.- Are all the bibliographical references of the article cited or mentioned in the body of the text?

13.- Does it include bibliography managed electronically and with active hyperlinks to the respective DOI, in all cases that correspond?

14.- Are the “APA Standards” in citations, sources and references followed?

15.- Is there internal consistency in the document?, that is:

1. a) Does it have adequate theoretical-methodological management?
2. b) Is there correspondence between the proposed objectives and their achievement?
3. c) Is there clarity in the exposition of the document? Is it properly ordered?
4. d) Is there a correlation between the exposition of the topic and the conclusions?

16.- Indicate if the body of the article includes: Introduction, State of the matter or background (sometimes they are incorporated into the introduction), Theoretical framework or conceptual references, Methodology, Results, analysis and discussion, Conclusions.

17.- Given your previous opinions, your recommendation is that the document be

      B. Publishable with freedom to incorporate the suggestions made to it.

      C. ubject to being published, only if the substantive revisions indicated in the suggestions are     carried out.